<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Internet Law Commentary &#187; SCOTUS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.internetlawcommentary.com/category/scotus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.internetlawcommentary.com</link>
	<description>Blog on Florida law, cases, and legal news from a Palm Beach Lawyer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 13:41:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Supreme Court, GPS Darts &amp; George Orwell</title>
		<link>http://www.internetlawcommentary.com/2011/11/03/u-s-supreme-court-gps-darts-george-orwell/</link>
		<comments>http://www.internetlawcommentary.com/2011/11/03/u-s-supreme-court-gps-darts-george-orwell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 17:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>internetlawcommentary</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCOTUS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetlawcommentary.com/?p=903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The case of U.S. v. Jones is set for oral argument before the U.S. Supreme Court next week and may resolve whether police may physically attach a GPS transmitter on a person&#8217;s car to track its movements for an extended period of time &#8212; without a warrant. Read the article from this month&#8217;s Palm Beach [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The case of U.S. v. Jones is set for oral argument before the U.S. Supreme Court next week and may resolve whether police may physically attach a GPS transmitter on a person&#8217;s car to track its movements for an extended period of time &#8212; without a warrant.<a href="http://www.internetlawcommentary.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/dart.gif"><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-904" title="dart" src="http://www.internetlawcommentary.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/dart-150x150.gif" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a></p>
<p>Read the article from this month&#8217;s Palm Beach Bar Bulletin, &#8220;<a href="http://www.internetlawcommentary.com/articles/2011_Jones_gps.PDF">The Supreme Court, GPS Darts &amp; George Orwell</a>.&#8221;</p>
<p>The underlying opinion is <a href="http://bit.ly/qBkAnk">here</a>.  The order on rehearing is <a href="http://bit.ly/p8vepf">here</a>.  The SCOTUS briefing schedule is <a href="http://bit.ly/nrSrx8">here</a>.</p>
<p>The ABA Journal piece, Sky-High Spy, is <a href="http://www.abajournal.com/mobile/article/sky-high_spy_with_gps_probing_the_zone_of_privacy_is_getting_even_smaller/">here</a>.</p>
<p>Another recent cellphone tracking case (in Florida) is <a href="http://bit.ly/ocjg4G">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.internetlawcommentary.com/2011/11/03/u-s-supreme-court-gps-darts-george-orwell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

